Personal Narrative in Game Maplestory Essay -- Online Roleplaying Game

Warriors: Wizards :: Mushrooms: Pigs The sun shone brightly as I stared off into the distant grass, swaying unrelentingly as the winds lashed upon it. But within the silky surface of the monotonous sea of green, I spotted an interruption – a staccato in the melody of the breeze. From afar, I could see only see a vague outline, but I knew it was approaching me, mindlessly yet fervently as if I were a light and it were a bug. And so it began. I tightly wielded my club. I could feel the coarseness of the wood beneath my battle-worn fingers. I lifted the weapon and situated it in front of me, grasping it firmly with both hands. I was a warrior, ordained by the venerable Chief Sitting Bull under the auspices of the proud tribe of Perion; I was not going to disappoint them. Honor above life, and killing enemies above all. Yeah†¦ I painfully watched my brother play his third hour of Maplestory, an online interactive game made by Korean programmers where the whole purpose is to defeat monsters to acquire new levels, magic, items – stuff you want, basically. He had just started what was soon to be his utmost craze and had just spoken to Chief Sitting Bull, an elderly man who appeared to be Native American, as he was adorned with elaborate feather-work and his clothing was of tanned skin. He was the typical Native American, you might say, and everything seemed to be in place. Almost too perfectly in place – except for the random black people that sporadically appeared among members of the Perion tribe. â€Å"Why don’t you head south east?† Perion was located in the northwest, and, seeing as he had a lot more training to do, I suggested that he explore the vast world. He headed south towards Henesys, which was a small uneventful, unimp... ...that it logically looked completely harmless – I was not ready to underestimate it because of my preconceptions. In this world, it was either kill or be killed. I swung at it with the heavy club, and, within moments, it closed its eyes serenely and dissolved. Works Cited Barash, David P. â€Å"Sociobiology and Behavior 2nd edition†. Elsevier: New York, 1982. Boehm, Christopher. â€Å"Hierarchy in the Forest : The Evolution of Egalitarian Behavior†. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1999. Breuer, Georg. â€Å"Sociobiology and the human dimension†. Cambridge Press: Cambridge, 1982. â€Å"racism.† Encyclopà ¦dia Britannica. 2007. Encyclopà ¦dia Britannica Online. 16 Oct. 2007 . Tseng, Roger. Personal Interview 10 Oct. 2007. Willson, Peter J. â€Å"The Domestication of the Human Species†. Yale University Press: New Haven, 1988.

The Significance of Art in The Republic of Plato

The Republic of Plato as parasols the justice of a censored society which, in reading The Republic as a philosophical treatise, is not surprising. Quotes abound in The Republic supporting this claim, such as â€Å"we must supervise the makers of tales; and if they make a fine tale, it must be approved, but if it's not, it must be rejected. We'll persuade nurses and mothers to tell the approved tales to their children and to shape their souls with tales more than their bodies with hands. Most of those they now tell must be thrown out. Bloom, Bibb)' Through-out the education of the guardians of the city within The Republic, Socrates restricts the poets and story tellers more and more, tossing out what ever would seem to harm his perfectly Just city or diminish the patriotism of those living within. It comes as no surprise that the casual reader may have qualms with this extreme censorship of the artist and what they are permitted to create. A closer reading and an Idea of the social s ignificance of the artist 2500 years ago, seems to reveal a different Intent to Socrates seemingly stubborn pollen of art.Plato was an artist himself, writing beautiful dramatic dialogues, which are most unlike the more modern philosophers like Kant or Hegel who write philosophical treatise. This distinction becomes important in how Plato Is read in comparison to other philosophers. In the mainstream philosophy of our time the most common way to read a philosopher's writing is through a collection of excerpts from many writers on a certain topic. These books are great for getting a lot of different views but unfortunately they destroy the messages contained in non philosophical treatise type writing, such as Plat's.Flats writing can not be taken out of context with excerpts. It would be Like taking Machete's speech from Shakespeare play Macbeth and saying that Is Shakespearean philosophy on the meaning of life, It simply does not do Justice to the writer and their work. The Republic Is about searching for Justice In the human soul, it is also about leading Glaucoma away from a political life because he has a possibly tyrannical soul (Palmer, 33-34)2. The arguments used to bring about these two points cannot be taken out of context from the book to portray a different theory of Plates.The prejudices against Plates philosophical writings usually come from taking an excerpt and applying logical analysis to prove his arguments invalid which simply displays a lack of understanding of how Plato writes. How Socrates came to talk to those in the dialogues, why he is talking to them, and what is not said is Just as important as what Is said in the Platonic dialogues, they are all dramas and should be read as such. Now that we have some reasons for doubting the common criticism of Plates views on art from The Republic.I would like to demonstrate specific reasons for doubting sides to bring about the perfectly Just city in speech and follow up with Socrates own criticism of this city and his reasons for doubting its relevance. The city in speech brought about with The Republic begins with the end of Socrates seeming refutation of Trashcans which Glaucoma rejects and restates the argument for further scrutiny (AAA-361 d). The argument is over whether it is a better life to live perfectly Just or perfectly unjust.Glaucoma states the argument as such â€Å"For I desire to hear what each is and what power it has all alone by itself when t is in the soul†dismissing its wages and its consequences. â€Å"(Bloom, Bibb) After some convincing, Socrates accepts the challenge to defend Justice (ICC). In taking on this feet, Socrates contrives an easier way to spot Justice in the soul. He claims that justice in the soul is like small letters and hard to see while Justice in a city is like big letters and will be easier to see (ICC-d). So Socrates sets out to creating a perfectly just city in speech to flush out Justice in the soul.Whether or not this is a decent attempt to find Justice will be dealt with later by Socrates himself. The first city created, or the first stage of the city, is based on a â€Å"city of utmost necessity' and grows only to the size of a small city (Palmer, 16; Bibb-371 b). Glaucoma rejects this simple city and wants one with more luxury (ICC-d). Socrates believes the first city created was the true and healthy city but he agrees to create a â€Å"feverish† city (IEEE). This forces the city to grow much larger and to take land away from neighbors to support it and, in doing so the city will need an army (37th-e).Attendants urges for a discussion of how these â€Å"guardians† of the city will be educated and reluctantly Socrates accepts and says like men telling myths within a myth we will educate the guardians (Palmer, 16; 37th). Socrates, in his own creation of this city in speech, is claiming here that he is telling a myth, and further, that the education of the guardians is a myth within a myth. This, ironically, is the beginning of the education of the guardians in which Socrates brings about his famed censorship.Socrates continues to give clues to his disapproval of his own argument, as if he is just putting on a show at this point. After discovering Justice in the city, Socrates ants to find out if it corresponds to Justice in the soul, remember the big and small letters. Socrates says â€Å"We were, I believe, saying that in order to get to the finest possible look at these things another and longer road around would be required, and to the man who took it they would become evident, but that proofs on a level with what had been said up to then could be tacked on.And you all said that would suffice. And so, you see, the statements made at that time were, as it looks to me, deficient in precision. If they were satisfactory to you, only you can tell. â€Å"(Bloom, Bibb; n reference to Dodd) Amazingly, Glaucoma accepts what Socrates called a deficient argument on both occasions, although the serious reader probably should not. (As Palmer, 23, remarks: â€Å"Heretofore, the arguments were so lacking in precision that they may have been without any value whatsoever (AAA-b). ) Socrates to tell how it could come into being (471 c-e). Glaucoma forgets, as most readers do, that the city was not created for the purpose of creating a city but for discovering Justice in the human soul. Socrates reminds him, in length, of his mistake and what the true purpose of the city is (Bibb-Bibb). Glaucoma's demand that the good city in speech be realized measures exactly the degree to which he has not understood the Republic. (Penetrate, 123)3 As seems to be true for anyone who believes Socrates was trying to create a true city, and therefore, any regulations Socrates makes within this city. Further evidence for this is evident later on when Glaucoma declares that the philosophers will not mind the business of politics because he finally understands the nonsen sical nature of the city. But, Socrates again reminds him of what they were really talking about and that the philosopher will mind the equines of the city within himself, he will mind the business of his own soul (Palmer, 32).Although the city in speech within The Republic does not seem to represent a real city and should not be taken as a literal attempt to create a perfectly Just city in reality, the fact remains that Plato does seem to be very hard on the artist, especially the poets. The image of the cave sets up mankind as looking at the shadows of artifacts displayed on the wall of a cave by the poets (Palmer, 28; AAA-51 AAA). This gives good reason for Socrates being so hard on them in the creation of the city in beech if the poets are the ones deceiving mankind.Today, of course, poets are not an influence on political life and it would seem ridiculous to accuse them of writing false poems. In Athens and ancient Greek culture, the poets were a major influence. They were the authority on the gods and on virtue. In fact, they were the only authority that would be quoted in a trial or by a representative of the people. They would be very well known by almost all inhabitants of Athens. â€Å"The poets are the unacknowledged legislators of mankind† (Penetrate, 223). It was not the arts homeless which Plato was attacking but their significance in politics.Plato was attempting to replace the poet's authority with the authority of philosophy or of reason, which would seem most natural to anyone today. Plat's true intent in his criticism of the poets is brought up later on in The Republic when in book X he attacks Homer specifically. He compares Homer to the likes of an artisan that makes objects or anything he wants including gods through representation (ICC). Glaucoma claims that this man could only be a sophist (59th). The implicit problem that Socrates poses with the poet is that he does not give an explanation of himself.Homer talks about virtuous p eople and the fantastic deeds they do but these heroes do not praise the poets for their deeds. The poet seems to have no place in his own writing and their â€Å"Speech seems to be subordinate to the deed. † Of the people they are praising (Bloom, 430). Socrates claims that the poet is an imitator of an imitator, in that, the poet appeals to the people and what they want and is only popular if they approve, he must follow the popular view. The people's view is shaped by the legislator who lays down laws in view of what he believes would be natural law (Bloom, 432).

Genocide in Germany - The Holocaust - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1591 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2019/04/26 Category History Essay Level High school Tags: Holocaust Essay Did you like this example? Genocide is by definition the intentional, methodical, and targeted destruction of a particular ethnic, religious, or racial group. The term genocide is derived from the Greek prefix genos, which translates to race or tribe, and the Latin suffix cide, meaning killing. The Holocaust, also known as Shoah, is the most notable and deadliest instance of genocide in the world. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Genocide in Germany The Holocaust" essay for you Create order The Holocaust began in Germany in the 1930s and expanded to Nazi occupied Germany, until the last liberation of death camps in 1945 . The Holocaust was a genocide in which the systemic and brutal killings of Jewish, Roma, Slavic, Serbic, Soviet, disabled, and homosexual, and many more, took place. The Holocaust originated in Germany, was fueled by anti-semitism, and committed by the Nazis. Anti-Semitism is a term used to describe the prejudice, discrimination, and general hatred of Jewish people. It is equally important to remember, however, that there were other victims of the Holocaust as well, which included Roma, Slavic, Serbic, Soviet, disabled, and homosexual people. Anti-semitism, had already been present in much of Europe before Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party rose to power. Germany, in particular, looked to Jewish people as the cause of many of their problems. Firstly, Jewish people were blamed for the German defeat in World War I. With the defeat now resting on their shoulders, it was no wonder that the German people also accredited the War Guilt Clause that resulted from the Treaty of Versailles to them as well. The Treaty of Versailles required that Germany pay reparations to the victors of the war, and this absolutely crippled the German economy, angering citizens further. This belief was made even more damaging considering the fact that many Germans also perceived Jewish people to be economically successful, which added insult to injury during a time when many Germans struggled to make ends meet. Lastly, Jewish people were deemed inferior to the pure Aryan race; to the Germans, Jewish people were unpatriotic, sneaky, backsliding tricksters, whose differing customs and religion polluted the superior German race. There is much speculation as to why Adolf Hitler may have hated Jewish people so fervently. Some historians suspect that it could be related to his heritage; Hitlers father Alois was born out of wedlock, and there were rumors that he might have been of Jewish descent. Adolf did not have a healthy relationship with his father, leading some to believe that this is a possible explanation for his contempt. Another possible case for Hitlers disgust for Jewish people could relate to his mothers Jewish doctor, Eduard Bloch. Kara Hitler suffered from breast cancer and received treatment from Dr. Bloch towards the end of her life. Some people correlate the unsuccessful treatment and death of Hitlers mother by a Jewish doctor as a cause for his rage. However, these rumors have never been confirmed and remain conjecture. A more plausible explanation for Hitlers disgusting and severe animosity was his time in Vienna, Austria. Hitler moved to Vienna in 1908 in hopes of attending the Vienna Academ y of Fine Arts. He was rejected, and instead spent his remaining time there living in squalor, at one point becoming homeless. Vienna at this time was characterized by vehement, socially accepted, and widespread anti-Semitism. Hitler lived out his formative years surrounded by anti-Jewish propaganda and persistent nationalism whilst dealing with rejection, poverty, and struggle. Hitler himself stated in his book Mein Kampf that his experience and indoctrination in Vienna is what led to him becoming an anti-Semite. Hitler and the Nazi Partys rise to power was fairly easy, considering the growing despair, outrage and unrest that was already present in Germany. The Nazis capitalized on this and convinced a desperate nation that Jewish, Romani, Polish, and Slavic people, along with homosexuals, communists and other minorities, were the reason for their misfortune. People belonging to these groups were consistently dehumanized, and considered a problem to be rectified. The Nazi party promised to restore Germany to its former glory, solve the Jewish question, and establish a new, larger state wherein pure Aryans could flourish. The star of the party, Adolf Hitler, was appointed as Fuhrer in January of 1933, and became Fuhrer, or leader, sometime in August 1934. Soon enough, the Nuremberg Laws were passed, marking the start of the systematic destruction of the Jewish population within Germany. The Nuremberg Laws passed in September 1935, consisted of the Reich Citizenship Law and the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor. They were designed to directly discriminate against Jewish people; the Reich Citizenship Law revoked Jewish Germans citizenship, and the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor forbade non-Jews from marrying Jews. Under Hitlers reign, anti-Semitism increased as did anti-Jewish propaganda and school curriculum. Jewish people were forced to wear yellow stars, identifying themselves as Jewish to the public, and were denied the right to their own businesses. More tragedy befell the Jewish people when Kristallnacht, a series of attacks on Jewish business, synagogues, people, occurred in November of 1938. Following the invasion of Poland, the Nazi party began establishing ghettos in order to further segregate and separate Jewish people and other minorities from society, and to make it easier to transport them to the concentrati on camps so they could begin the genocide. The preliminary step in implementing the horrific and systematic killings was Operation Reinhard, an operation that consisted of liquidating ghettos and transporting survivors to the concentration camps. The deportation and transportation of Jewish people occurred over several days. They were often times loaded like animals into boarded up, cramped train compartments, where they would have to endure long journeys without food, water, or a place to relieve themselves. Many died due to this inhumane treatment. Upon arrival at the camps, Jewish people and individuals from Germany, Poland, Holland, Belgium and other countries were stripped of their belongings, shaved, sometimes tattooed with a prisoner number, and given striped uniforms. This was meant to strip them of their dignity and dehumanize them further. The victims were then separated into groups; those designated to work as slaves or subjects of experimentation, and those who would be killed immediately by gas chamber or firing squad. Surviving prisoners suffered from disease, were starved of food, crammed into inadequate living spaces, and worked to the bone. The population of the concentration eventually grew too large, so the Nazis established even more camps that were expressly reserved for killing. Many more horrors occurred in these camps, the depths of which many people today cant imagine. There will always be people who to choose to disregard or downplay tragic occurrences, and the holocaust is no different, despite the multitude of evidence. Holocaust denial is a serious and racist issue that remains prevalent today, and describes multiple and incorrect beliefs on what happened; it includes minimizing the number of victims deaths, claiming that the Final Solution culminated in Nazis deporting the Jews without killing them, that the gas chambers were not used for execution but delousing, and that the Jews died of disease or were casualties of war, just to name a few. Many Holocaust deniers operate under the guise of historical revisionism, but the method of Holocaust deniers are faulty and differ from actual historians. Holocaust denial is without a doubt completely wrong, inaccurate, and anti-Semitic. The various testimonies of survivors, Nazis, and Allied soldiers who liberated the concentration camps, not to mention the undeniable evidence, are testament to what ha ppened during the Holocaust. Holocaust denial is used as another tool with which to hate Jewish people, and by minimizing the pain and suffering of the victims of the Holocaust, Holocaust deniers are effectively continuing the hate that has persisted against the Jewish community for centuries. The results of the Holocaust are absolutely devastating. After the liberation of the concentration camps upon the victory of the Allied powers, millions of Holocaust survivors and refugees still could not return home, due to the anti-semitism that was still rampant. They lost their families, belongings, and suffered tremendously from trauma. Those who tried to emigrate to the west lived in displaced persons camps where they remained for years, and some were turned away at the borders of multiple countries . Numerous people advocated for an exodus to Palestine, where they could form a safe haven and an independent Jewish state, but were still turned away. However, Israel was eventually established on May 14, 1948. The Holocaust not only decimated the European Jewish population, but affected them for the rest of their lives. The number of victims of the Holocaust has not been definitively proven, because it was never properly recorded, and what records were kept had been destroyed by t he Nazis prior to their loss. With that being said, most estimates place the total victims combined as low as 6 million and as high as 20 million. In the end, the Holocaust was an evil, methodical, deliberate, and completely barbaric genocide that ended and destroyed the lives of millions of people. The Nazi party, including Adolf Hitler, capitalized on the anger of the German people in order to facilitate hatred for the Jewish people, amongst others. Through established law, they identified and then removed Jewish people and other victims from their homes, and transported them to concentration camps. Evil within the concentration camps knew no bounds, and millions of people were killed, living the remainder of their life in fear and agony. The Nazis dehumanized their victims and acted with infinite cruelty. The Holocaust must never be forgotten, and stands as a reminder to the unparalleled malevolence that human beings are capable of.

Nervous Tissue Glial Cells

Neuroglia, also called glia or glial cells, are non-neuronal cells of the nervous system. They compose a rich support system that is essential to the operation of nervous tissue and the nervous system. Unlike neurons, glial cells do not have axons, dendrites, or conduct nerve impulses. Neuroglia are typically smaller than neurons and are about three times more numerous in the nervous system. Glia perform a number of functions in the nervous system, including physically supporting the brain; assisting in nervous system development, repair, and maintenance; insulating neurons; and providing metabolic functions for neurons. Types of Glial Cells There are several types of glial cells present in the central nervous system (CNS) and peripheral nervous system of humans. They each serve different purposes for the body. The following are the six main types of neuroglia. Astrocytes Astrocytes are found in the brain and spinal cord and are 50 times more plentiful than neurons and the most abundant cell type in the brain. Astrocytes are easily identifiable due to their unique star-shape. The two main categories of astrocytes are protoplasmic and fibrous. Protoplasmic astrocytes are found in the gray matter of the cerebral cortex, while fibrous astrocytes are found in the white matter of the brain. The primary function of astrocytes is to provide structural and metabolic support to neurons. Astrocytes also aid in transmitting signals between neurons and brain blood vessels to control the intensity of blood flow, though they do not do the signaling themselves. Other functions of astrocytes include glycogen storage, nutrient provision, ion concentration regulation, and neuron repair. Ependymal Cells Ependymal cells are specialized cells that line the cerebral ventricles and central canal of the spinal cord. They are found within the choroid plexus of the meninges. These ciliated cells surround capillaries of the choroid plexus. Functions of ependymal cells include CSF production, nutrient provision for neurons, filtration of harmful substances, and neurotransmitter distribution. Microglia Microglia are extremely small cells of the central nervous system that remove cellular waste and protect against the invasion of harmful microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, and parasites. Because of this, microglia are thought to be a type of macrophage, a white blood cell that protects against foreign matter. They also help to reduce inflammation in the body through the release of anti-inflammatory chemical signals. Additionally, microglia protect the brain by disabling malfunctioning neurons that become injured or diseased. Satellite Cells Satellite glial cells cover and protect neurons of the peripheral nervous system. They provide structure and metabolic support to sensory, sympathetic, and parasympathetic nerves. Sensory satellite cells are often linked to pain and sometimes even said to be associated with the immune system. Oligodendrocytes Oligodendrocytes are central nervous system structures that wrap around some neuronal axons to form an insulating coat known as the myelin sheath. The myelin sheath, composed of lipids and proteins, functions as an electrical insulator of axons and promotes more efficient conduction of nerve impulses. Oligodendrocytes are generally found in the brains white matter, but satellite oligodendrocytes are found in gray matter. Satellite oligodendrocytes do not form myelin. Schwann Cells Schwann cells, like oligodendrocytes, are neuroglia that create the myelin sheath in peripheral nervous system structures. Schwann cells help to improve nerve signal conduction, nerve regeneration, and antigen recognition by T cells. Schwann cells play a vital role in nerve repair. These cells migrate to the site of injury and release growth factors to promote nerve recovery, then myelinate newly generated nerve axons. Schwann cells are being heavily researched for their potential use in spinal cord injury repair. Both oligodendrocytes and Schwann cells indirectly assist in the conduction of impulses, as myelinated nerves can conduct impulses quicker than unmyelinated ones. White brain matter gets its color from large numbers of myelinated nerve cells. Sources Purves, Dale. â€Å"Neuroglial Cells.†Ã‚  Neuroscience | 2nd Edition, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2001.Sofroniew, Michael V., and Harry V. Vinters. â€Å"Astrocytes: Biology and Pathology.†Ã‚  SpringerLink, Springer-Verlag, 10 Dec. 2009.

Booker T. Washingtons Influence on Historically Black...

BOOKER T. WASHINGTON: THE AMBIGUITY OF INFLUENCE ABSTRACT My paper will discuss the continuing influence of Booker T. Washingtons writings on historically black colleges. While my paper will focus on the ways in which the historically black college continues to adhere to the model provided by Washington, it will also explore the ways in which it diverges from the early Hampton-Tuskegee ideal. According to James D. Anderson in The Education of Blacks in the South, both contemporary observers and later historians have portrayed the white south as taking a monolithic view of black education. However, many secondary schools in the south did not emphasize the kind of industrial education advocated by Washington. In the same manner,†¦show more content†¦The first freedmens schools were run by the freedmen and women themselves. Booker T. Washingtons account of his own perseverence in securing his education is poignantly told in Up From Slavery. Yet with Washingtons influence, a shift began from educating students in a liberal arts tradition to an industrial training mode. Unfortunately, by the turn of the century, with the help of the benefactor Samuel Chapman Armstrong, the Hampton-Tuskegee Idea had come to represent the ideological antithesis of the educational and social movement begun by ex-slaves (33). In order for freed slaves to fully participate in a democracy, a classical liberal curriculum was adopted in post-Civil War black, elementary, normal and collegiate schools. As James D. Anderson aptly points out, Black leaders did not view their adoption of the classical liberal curriculum or its philosophical foundations as mere imitation of white schooling. Indeed, they knew many whites who had no education at all. Rather, they saw this curriculum as providing access to the best intellectual trad itions of their era and the best means to understanding their own historical development and sociological uniqueness. (Anderson 29) In fact, black educators like Richard Wright found support in the classics for racial equality; the study of the classics was a means to understanding the

Ielts vs Toefl Free Essays

Many students around the world look forward for studying in the United State of America. They are required to pass any English as A Second Language exam. The two most popular exams for international students are the TOEFL-IBT and the IELTS. We will write a custom essay sample on Ielts vs Toefl or any similar topic only for you Order Now Many students get confused which exam is easier for them. In fact, it depends on the student to decide which is the easiest for him or her. There are many reasons to consider whether to choose taking the IELTS or the TOEFL-IBT. One of the biggest differences between these exams is in the speaking section. In the TOEFL-IPT, students use computers to take the exam. The speaking section on the TOEFL-IBT requires listening to six conversations and lectures, then students must talk about the conversations or the lectures that they heard for one minutes each. In the IELTS, students do not use computers and do not listen to any conversation or lecture. They speak with examiners instead of computers. The examiners ask some general and specific questions then they must answer these questions. Many students say that the IELTS is easier than the TOEFL-IBT in the speaking section because it is more reliable. For example, in the TOEFL-IBT, some students may get lectures about subjects that they are not familiar with such as physics and chemistry. Many students say it is difficult to speak for one minute with computers under pressure about something that they have not talked about before. On the IELTS, on the other hand, students get general and specific questions such as education, sport and business. They said that they can speak and discus with examiners about these questions and it is the best way to measure their abilities in speaking. The second difference between the TOEFL-IBT and the IELTS exams is in the writing section. The biggest difference is in the way that students write. In the TOEFL-IBT, students use computers in the whole exam. Therefore, they should type two essays in sixty minutes. On the IELTS, on the other hand, students use paper and pencils to write their essays. They must write two different essays in sixty minute by hand. It is obvious that it depends on the students to choose what is easier for them. For example, some students are good writer on the computer. They can type faster than writing by hand. Therefore, they prefer the TOEFL-IBT rather than the IELTS because they can write more word in less time using computers. On the other hand, some students prefer the IELTS because they are very slow writers using computers. It takes them more time to write and look for the letters on the keyboard. As a result, they prefer the IELTS because they used to write by hand and they do not want to waste their time looking for the liters on the keyboard. The third difference is in the listening section. In the TOEFL-IBT, students get questions first. They can read the questions and prepare for what they should listen to, then they listen to the lectures or conversations. On the other hand, the students who take the TOEFL-IBT are not allowed to read any question that they will be asked. Therefore, they listen to the lectures or the conversations and take notes then they get the questions. In fact, many students believe that the TOEFL-IBT is difficult in the Listening Section because they do not know what they will be asked after the lectures. For example, in the TOEFL-IBT, many students get confused while they are listening to the lectures. The lectures normally take six minutes and they cannot take note on everything that the lectures say. On the IELTS, the students hear the lectures while they read questions. They can answer questions directly then they can move to the next question. In the end, many students work hardly to learn English to study in the U. S. many of them have good English abilities but they fail in English as A Second Language exams. Some students choose wrong exams that do not match their skills. They do not know the differences between the TOEFL-IBT and the IELTS. The Writing, Speaking and Listening sections are different between the TOEFL-IBT and the IELTS. How to cite Ielts vs Toefl, Essay examples

A Journey Through The Golden Gates Of free essay sample

Promise Essay, Research Paper A Journey Though the? Golden Gates? of Promise Great contention exists over the true promises of the? Golden Gates? in the United States. Discrimination occurs with different cultural groups, but for those immigrants permitted into the state, the chances are first-class. The Torahs and patterns established to command in-migration into the United States limit the sum of poorness that can be present in the state. Without these of import patterns and Torahs created by the United States Congress, ? cheap? labour would overmaster American citizen labour and take the state to an economic and societal calamity. Although the United States is frequently criticized for its constitution of in-migration Torahs and patterns during 1865 and 1930, these actions are really just. It seems that the people of China have received a batch sum of favoritism as they try to venture into the promise lands of the United States. Early favoritism of the Chinese is revealed when sing early Torahs and patterns of the United States towards in-migration. Not merely did Congress base on balls Torahs and limitations against Chinese but the attitudes of citizens towards the Chinese frequently led to tumults and resentment towards the immigrants geting from China. In the 1850? s, the California legislative assembly passed a series of anti-Chinese limitations. These limitations forbade Chinese Americans to inscribe their kids in public schools, to get married Whites, or to attest against Whites in the tribunal of jurisprudence. Some peculiar tribunal instances display the effects of this jurisprudence. A really disconcerting California tribunal instance determination in the 1850? s for the Chinese people is called Peoples vs. Hall. In August of 1853, George W. Hall, his brother, and their friend assaulted a Chinese mineworker in Nevada County. When Ling Sing, the Chinese adult male? s cousin, came to assist him, Hall shooting and killed Ling Sing. During the original test, Hall was found guilty of slaying charges and sentenced to decease. Hall appealed the determination to the California Supreme Court and he was acquitted because no white informants to the slaying were available. This logical thinking is supported by the California State Civil Practice Act ( under Section 394 ) that says no black, mulatto, or Indian can give testimony against white suspects in condemnable instances. The contention over this instance occurs non merely because of the obvious favoritism but because Chinese are non specifically referred to in the act and it is assumed that Indians and Asians belong to the same cultural group. Basically anyone who was non considered white was looked down upon by the American white population. # 8220 ; The word # 8216 ; white # 8217 ; has a distinguishable meaning, which ex vi end point, excludes black, xanthous, and all other colourss, # 8221 ; ( Beesley 123 ) . Chief Justice Hugh C. Murray, felt that the line had to be drawn, farther provinces, # 8220 ; the same regulation that would acknowledge them to attest, would acknowledge them to all the equal rights of citizenship, and we might shortly see them at the polls, in the jury box, upon the bench, and in our legislative halls, # 8221 ; ( Beesley 123 ) . The opinion of the Hall tribunal instance led to many violent tumults among white American citizens and Chinese immigrants. Another action taken to seek and acquire rid of the Chinese immigrants was the California Miner? s Tax of 1855. Its exclusive intent was to drive Chinese immigrants out of the excavation concern by taxing foreign mineworkers every month. Many Chinese spoke out about these patterns. ? When your honest authorities threw unfastened the district of California, the people of other lands were welcomed here to seek for gold and to prosecute in trade. The ship-masters of your well-thought-of state came over to our state, lauded the equality of your Torahs, extolled the beauty of your manners and imposts, and made it known that your officers and people were highly affable toward the Chinese # 8230 ; . we trusted in your earnestness # 8230 ; .But alas! what times are these! ? when former sort rela-tions are forgotten, when we Chinese are viewed like stealers and enem ies # 8230 ; ? ( Pun 589 ) . These atrocious Torahs and patterns towards Chinese in-migration led to many violent events. In 1871, a rabble of Whites invaded a Chinese vicinity in Los Angles and killed 21 occupants. A similar event occurred in 1876 that became know as the Truckee Raid. During this incident, whites torched a Chinese place and shooting its occupants when they fled into the streets. More episodes followed that were frequently instigated by the? Order of Caucasians? , hoods who openly advocated force. Groups such as the? Order of Caucasians? became common during this clip period and provoked Chinese favoritism. The early favoritism of Chinese immigrants is the foundation for the ulterior favoritism that developed and shortly pertained non merely to Chinese immigrants but to all immigrants in general. In 1879, Congress passed a Chinese Exclusion Bill, giving in to coerce from anti-Chinese organisations and doing a trade with Western lawgivers who promised political favours. Subsequently, in 1882, Congress passed, and President Arthur signed the Chinese Exclusion Act. This act barred all Chinese immigrants from the United States for ten old ages, except pupils, merchandisers, and kids of Chinese-American citizens. Although this act was enacted, the Chinese already present in the United States, were ready and willing submit to the designs of white Americans: ? Their curiously cautiouss and nonaggressive character was shown in every line of industry # 8230 ; .Not the least of their good qualities appeared to be this inclination to mind their ain concern and steal off before the more aggressive Anglo-Saxon # 8230 ; .Several early perceivers and innovators praised their spirit of subordination to the jurisprudence in comparing with other and more anarchic immigrants # 8230 ; . # 82 21 ; ( Coolidge 24 ) . In 1892, the exclusions were extended and they remained in topographic point until 1943. This peculiar exclusion act represented the first clip Congress had restricted in-migration and it marked the lone juncture in United States history that an cultural group was specifically singled out for exclusion. A head revenue enhancement was besides placed on each Chinese immigrant already present in the United States with the Chinese Exclusion Act taking to harsh attitudes from Chinese people towards the American authorities. The Chinese Exclusion Act is the foundation for the many cultural discriminatory Acts of the Apostless to follow covering with in-migration. In 1907, Theodore Roosevelt issued an executive order that forbade Nipponese to come in the United States from Mexico and Canada and so convinced Japan to deter its citizens from immigrating into the United States. The Gentlemen? s Agreement of 1907-8 ended the in-migration of Nipponese labourers to the United States by holding the Nipponese authorities garbage to publish passports to such individuals. This understanding besides said that the United States should halt favoritism against the Japanese. The Gentleman # 8217 ; s Agreement did let married womans to fall in their hubbies if they were already in America. Since the overpowering figure of Nipponese in the United States in 1907 were males, the understanding led to a rush in legal in-migration of females, who were frequently married by # 8220 ; proxy # 8221 ; in Japan to hubbies who chose married womans on the footing of images sent from the female parent state to America. The Gentlemen? s Agreement displays the favoritism t owards Nipponese immigrants the beginning of general in-migration. The California Alien Land Acts of 1913 and 1920 affects merely Asians besides. The people most affected by this act are Nipponese husbandmans because it bars them from having land. Peoples affected by the California Alien Land Act are those # 8220 ; ineligible to citizenship # 8221 ; ( Asiatic immigrants ) who were non allowed to have or rent # 8220 ; existent belongings # 8221 ; ( land ) unless a United States pact provided otherwise. The effect was that Nipponese immigrants were non allowed to have farms in California. Most of the provinces west of the Mississippi River enacted similar Torahs shortly after. Harmonizing to these Torahs, if an foreigner non eligible to citizenship tested to rent or have agricultural land, the trade was considered void and the land became the belongings of the State. The Alien Land Laws were justified as a agency of protecting white husbandmans while at the same clip know aparting against the Nipponese immigrants because it left more land availabl e for white husbandmans. In 1917, Congress established the Asiatic Barred Zone, closing off the flow of emigres from a part that encompassed non merely China, but besides Japan, Korea, India, Indochina, East Indies, Polynesia, parts of Russia, Arabia, and Afghanistan besides. This act was enacted to seek and ease the tenseness originating between American citizens and the reaching of many Asiatic immigrants. When this act was being created, the Asiatic Exclusion League demanded the exclusion of Koreans because they are the 3rd ample group from the Far East. Together, the limitations on Chinese, Nipponese, and Koreans excluded virtually all Asians who wanted to come to the United States. The Barred Zone Act made it about impossible for the in-migration of Indians to happen, although pupils, bookmans, curates of faith and merchandisers could come in and remain sometimes. As Sucheng Chan stated, # 8220 ; Stereotypes of Asiatic immigrants as drudgery, degraded, and servile people # 8211 ; so, practical slaves # 8211 ; notwithstanding, members of every Asian immigrant group did stand up for their rights and fought subjugation in a myriad of ways # 8221 ; ( 81 ) . The favoritism of different cultural groups grows as new Acts of the Apostless and patterns are enacted doing more uproar between immigrants and non-immigrants. Immigrants frequently ran into problem when seeking to get married due to patterns of the United States. In 1880, the California Civil Code was amended to forbid inter-racial matrimonies between a white individual and a? Negro, Mulatto, Mongolian, and individuals of assorted blood. ? Again, the term? white? was interpreted slackly and hence, everyone that was non genuinely Caucasic was non considered to be white. The Expatriation Act of 1907 provided that an American adult female, naturalized or native born, who marries a alien loses her citizenship. This jurisprudence angered many adult females and was enforced to seek and cut down on the figure of immigrants come ining the state. Many adult females, although non involved straight with this act, found it to be corrupt. # 8220 ; Her right to stay a citizen or go one, to vote or exert other political fringe benefits of American citizenship, to shack in the United States without menace of exile or exile, to come in certain businesss, to re-enter the state after an absence abroad, to bask the protection of the U.S. authorities while going outside the state, and to procure American citizenship for her kids was now entirely dependent on the citizenship of the adult male she wed? ( Bredbenner 60 ) . The steering premise of this act is that any adult female, who would voluntarily get married a alien, is no longer meriting of and no longer to be trusted with, United States citizenship. These Torahs and patterns of immigrant and non-immigrant matrimonies are detering because many citizens really gave up their function in the American society to be with person that they truly attention for. In that sense, the Torahs did non ever? acquire the best? of the immigrants. The construct of a individual giving up their citizenship to an immigrant displays how pathetic the Torahs and patterns affecting in-migration truly are. During the old ages of 1880 and 1920, the? Great Migration? , more than 27,000,000 immigrants were brought to the United States? dirt. Western Europeans continued to get in North America, but they were eclipsed by peoples from the Southern and Eastern parts of the continent. Before this? Great Migration? , ( 1850-1880 ) more than 200,000 Chinese, 90 % of them male, sailed across the Pacific Ocean and settled in California, Colorado, and other Western districts. Equally good as being a beginning of labour, these foreign people bring thoughts, theories, stuffs, and enrapturing new nutrients with them as they walk through the? Golden Gates. ? A whole new universe is revealed for the United States as these foreign human existences arrive on the American land. As more immigrants travel to the promise lands, more diverseness begins to happen. A society with a great trade of diverseness is frequently more likely to be acceptable to the new people because it is much more hard to individual o ut specific civilizations and cultural groups when such a assortment is present. The thoughts and imposts introduced to the United States through in-migration is good to the civilization as a whole because it allows cultural diverseness to happen making a balanced society of people. In 1921, the first quantitative in-migration jurisprudence was adopted to put impermanent quotas harmonizing to nationality. This jurisprudence, known as the Quota Act of 1921 put a ceiling on in-migration, leting each cultural group to turn each twelvemonth by 3 % of its population in 1910. The act established a annual ceiling of 357,000 immigrants from outside the Western Hemisphere. This quota jurisprudence applied to all immigrants from Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and certain islands in the Atlantic and Pacific. In 1924, Congress enacted the Johnson-Reed Act ( National Origins Act ) which cut the overall ceiling 151,000 immigrants and decreased each annual nationality quota to 2 % of its per centum of the United States population as recorded in 1890. The act froze out Asiatic immigrants but exempted the quotas with Canada and Mexico because they were the 2 environing states and it was best to maintain peace with them. This act in 1924 is the first las ting in-migration quota jurisprudence to of all time be established in American history. It created a penchant quota system, non-quota position, consular control system, and the Border Patrol. The one-year quotas of the 1924 act were eventually made permanent in 1929. Immigrants from northern and western Europe are considered extremely adaptable and more likely to # 8220 ; fit in # 8221 ; with Americans than immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe are. Immigrants from Britain, Germany and Ireland were assigned generous quotas. The quotas for states such as Russia, the beginning for most Judaic immigrants, and Italy were cut back. Practically all Asians were barred from come ining the United States. The quotas set up erectile dysfunctions covering with in-migration are really of import because, without them, the United States would go overpopulated and it would easy deteriorate. If Congress did non make the quota Torahs as a manner to command who is allowed to come in the state, it would go forth the magnificent? Golden Gates? unfastened to anyone who wanted to come in the promise land. It is insane to even see allowing everyone of every ethnicity into the United States because the consequences would be lay waste toing for the American society. American citizens frequently criticize that the quota Torahs discriminate towards different cultural groups, but, in world, it is common sense to prefer allowing immigrants into the state that are more likely to? suit in? with the civilizations being practiced already. Diversity is good and it is fantastic that the United States realizes this point. Congress allows a certain figure of immigrants from each foreign state to come in the United States. The sta tes that contain more intellectually educated people are much more welcome in the United States because they are the people who will most likely benefit the society and economic system. Having unskilled immigrants invade the United States leads to cheap labour and, hence, the citizens already present in America will lose occupations. The Southern Railroad Company is an illustration of this. This peculiar railway hired Chinese to assist put track but they were resented by Whites because they accepted lower rewards. It is really logical for an employer to engage an immigrant who will work for low wage instead than a citizen who wants to gain more money. The quota Torahs helped forestall the whole thought of inexpensive labour in the United States. Although it did happen, without the quota Torahs present, the United States will shortly happen itself in complete poorness and hurt. Another act that is frequently considered controversial is the Immigration Act of 1917. This act stated that all immigrants older than 16 of age had to show literacy in one linguistic communication. It does non count in which linguistic communication the immigrant demonstrates this cognition. Peoples such as Roosevelt felt strongly about these types of actions by Congress, ? We have room in this state for but one flag, the Stars and Stripes? We have room for but one trueness, trueness to the United States? We have room for but one linguistic communication, the English linguistic communication? ( Day and Day 27 ) . This act is merely another manner for Congress to seek and better the United States by leting literate immigrants to come in instead than immigrants who are non highly intelligent. Congress really had sympathy for the many immigrants that wanted the chances of the United States. In 1903, the Pensionado Act was developed. This act was important because it allowed Filipino pupils the chance to analyze in the United States. The instruction in the United States is far more advanced than that of the Philippines. In 1900, Congress enacted the Foraker Act, which granted Puerto Rico a modicum of local authorities. Under these conditions, Puerto Ricans are subjects, non citizens, like modern-day Filipinos. In 1917, President Woodrow Wilson signed the Jones-Shafroth Act. This jurisprudence gave Puerto Ricans U.S. citizenship. The Jones Act separated the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative subdivisions of Puerto Rican authorities, provided civil rights to the person, and created a locally elected bicameral legislative assembly. The 2 houses were a Senate consisting of 19 members and a 39-member House of Representatives. However, the Governor and the President of the Unit ed States had the power to blackball any jurisprudence passed by the legislative assembly. Besides, the United States Congress had the power to halt any action taken by the legislative assembly in Puerto Rico. The U.S. maintained control over financial and economic affairs and exercised authorization over mail services, in-migration, defence and other basic governmental affairs. Under this act, all Puerto Ricans are declared citizens unless they officially reject that position. Overall, the United States was really sympathetic for immigrants and granted them many rights that would let them to stand out in life. Although Congress is considered to be rough with in-migration Torahs, they genuinely do care about the immigrants but they besides fear the consequences of excessively many immigrants in the United States. In 1924, Congress made all native-born American Indians citizens of the United States. This action by Congress is a immense measure for the American Indian population because, in 1887, the Dawes Act was truly the lone intimation that the Native Americans would hold a portion in the American society. The Dawes Act conferred citizenship on acculturated Indians non populating on reserves, citizenship that many Western provinces and vicinities refused, in pattern, to acknowledge. Therefore, the given citizenship for Native Americans was a really of import portion of their Hunt for equality. In 1922, Congress passed the Cable Act which ended the prejudiced pattern of the Expatriation Act of 1907 except for those female citizens who married? foreigners ineligible to citizenship, ? ( Asia tic foreigners. ) The Cable Act was the more advanced signifier of an 1855 act that said residential foreign adult females who married American citizens were automatically citizens. Simply for protection grounds for immigrants, the Alien Contract Labor Laws of 1885,1887,1888, and 1891 prohibited immigrants from come ining the state to work under contracts made before their reaching. Despite unfavorable judgment that Congress receives for many in-migration Torahs, it is shown through these peculiar Torahs and patterns merely how willing Congress was to allow rights to different cultural groups. The commixture of cultural groups was considered a? runing pot. ? ? ? America is God? s Crucible, the great Melting Pot where all the races of Europe are runing and reforming! Here you stand, good common people, think I, when I see them at Ellis Island, here you stand in your 50 groups with your 50 linguistic communications and histories, and your 50 blood hates and competitions, but you won? T be long like that brothers, for these are the fires of God you? ve come to- these are the fires of God? God is doing the American? the existent American has non yet arrived. He is merely in the crucible, I tell you- he will be the merger of all the races, the coming demigod? ( Zangwill 37 ) . Although many people accept the theory of a? runing pot? , some Americans still disagree with this system. ? It is no solution for those who wish to take part in American life, and yet want to retain their cultural individuality? ( Jacobson 645 ) . Many people didn? t appreciation the construct that if co nditions in a female parent state are bad plenty to desire to immigrate into another state that a individual is traveling to hold to give in a small. In this instance, giving up some of their civilization to conform more to the American civilization was merely one forfeit that was expected. The United States wants to assist out different cultural groups, but it is highly hard to assist out each group on an single footing and it is non logical to allow all immigrants the same rights because they come from different rational and cultural backgrounds with different involvements and outlooks. Congress developed many different ways to test who can come in the United States. These procedures are really of import in commanding the type of population that lives in the United States. In 1891, Congress created the Immigration and Naturalization Service, otherwise known as the INS. This service was developed to administrate federal Torahs associating to the admittance, exclusion, and exile of foreigners and the naturalisation of foreigners legitimately shacking in the United States. The INS was required to implement the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the Contract Labor Law of 1885, and the Immigration Act of 1891. In 1875, a jurisprudence that prohibited entry of cocottes and inmates established direct federal ordinance of in-migration. The authorities of the United States saw these types of people as a danger to the state. In 1892, the INS opened up an in-migration testing station at Ellis Island in New York Harbor and claimed this to be the INS central office. Sing Ellis Islan d was astonishing for most immigrants: ? I remember seeing the Statue of Liberty for the first clip and it was the greatest bang. It was a really clear, sharp twenty-four hours in February. And it was such a bang that it? s difficult to depict? ( Coan 207 ) . More than 12,000,000 immigrants underwent in-migration processing or detainment at Ellis Island from January 1, 1892 until November 12, 1954. Congress is seeking really hard to test immigrants come ining the United States so that lone immigrants that can lend positively will be allowed entryway by set uping an orderly method of make up ones minding which immigrants could remain and which immigrants would non be allowed to stay in the United States. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 is an illustration of testing immigrants because it barred inmates, the insane, and the cognitively disabled from come ining the United States. In 1893, the United States authorities made it a demand that steamer companies had to enter in manifests the critical statistics of all riders aboard that peculiar ship. Many people were involved with this technique of testing immigrants. An immigrant inspector was given the undertaking of verifying the information on the manifest sheets and was given the power to alter or simplify immigrant names. Many times the names of immigrants were either shortened or replaced with more? Americanized? names. This m ade it non merely easier on the inspectors to place different immigrants but it besides made it easier for the immigrants to? suit in? with the people populating in America. Immigrants seeking to come in the United States have to demo their money to inspectors to turn out that they are non paupers. Equally controversial as this issue seems to be, it is really logical for the authorities to desire immigrants to hold some money. As the immigrants venture out into the new lands, the United States hopes that they will be able to pass some money in America and assist the state to thrive. In 1906, cognition of the English linguistic communication was made a basic demand for immigrants. Congress felt that if an immigrant was traveling to come to America, that it would be necessary for that individual to cognize English so that endurance in the New World would non be so hard. Legislation excluded all mentally handicapped individuals, paupers, and those who might go public charges. It exclud ed those enduring from a contagious disease, every bit good as those convicted of a felony, an crying offense, or a misdemeanour affecting a moral depravity. Anarchists were added to the list of unacceptable foreigners in 1903. In 1907, Congress passed a jurisprudence excepting immigrants with physical disablements or mental defects that might impact their ability to gain a life. The United States authorities was really concerned for these immigrants? public assistance and did non desire to see them come in the state and stop up in poorness. The same jurisprudence besides barred those immigrants that had TB and kids unaccompanied by their parents. After 1907, immigrants had to show their physical wellness during a thorough medical scrutiny. In 1924, the Immigration Bureau made immigrants registry with the authorities and gave them paperss that described their legal position. The Immigration Bureau has been a portion of the Department of Labor since 1913. This really of import Immigr ation Bureau set up the Border Patrol which is made up of 400 recruits who are trained in jurisprudence, probe techniques, fingerprinting, jujutsu, the usage of pieces, and tracking and draging. These are all really of import Torahs and patterns established by the United States Congress as a manner to cover with the enormous figure of people who crave in-migration into America. Each act is enacted for different grounds but in general, if Congress sits back and does nil about this haste of immigrants to America, our state will crumple and, non merely will immigrants suffer, but besides the citizens that have already gained their rights to be here will be devastated. It is non just to make that to the American citizens. Although many immigrants find it to be know aparting towards their specific cultural group, when analysing the construct of showing, it is really apparent to see why Congress has developed more Torahs. The United States authorities is non nescient ; they merely want wh at is best for the state. If maintaining the American citizens secure with an economic system of prosperity and a society of felicity is non considered carnival, so justification for these Acts of the Apostless and patterns can non be described. A state filled with hoods, cocottes, and unskilled people benefits the state in no manner and therefore the intelligent United States of America authorities use their power to make systems to assist avoid this awful hereafter from happening. Laws and patterns established by the United States towards in-migration during 1865 and 1930 are really just despite the contention and unfavorable judgment that exists over this issue. Discrimination occurs with different cultural groups but for those immigrants permitted into the state, the chance to stand out in life is first-class. The Torahs and patterns established to command in-migration into the United States limited the sum of poorness that can be present in the state. Besides, the state # 8217 ; s authorities is looking out for the best involvement of American citizens by non leting stupid, unskilled, thugs into the state. Without these of import patterns and Torahs created by the United States Congress? cheap? labour would overmaster American citizen labour and take the state to an economic and societal dislocation. No inquiry exists that the Torahs and patterns established by the United States towards in-migration do so know apart certain cultural groups but, in order fo r the state to keep a stable and organized society, the actions of Congress are necessary. These patterns and Torahs offer immigrants an chance to break their lives merely by walking through the? Golden Gates. ? The Statue of Liberty abundantly symbolizes hope for immigrants, ? Give me your tired, your hapless, your huddled multitudes hankering to take a breath free, the deplorable garbage of your pullulating shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the aureate door! ? ( Lazarus 42 ) 361