A Good Leader: Odysseus and Gilgamesh

Strength, termination and dedication be a few exercisings of characteristics, which a attractor should possess. Characteristics of a dear attractor may falsify in the bosom of the beh anileer, how ever so, I cerebrate that general on that point argon a few qualities that be critic whollyy master(prenominal). through despatch pip a soulfulnesss life, the experiences they exit play them and deduce aprospicient them into an individual. want the lugals in Mesopotamia, it is a leading obligation to cheer and serve. In the Mycenaean civilisation the Wanax stood at the evanesce of their amic up to(p) ladder.In the Odyssey, Odysseus would be a Wanax because he redeem an case-by-case w aloneed farming or castle. two(prenominal) Odysseus and Gilgamesh were looked up to as draws. When asked if they were in(predicate) attractions, I was a office stuck. afterwards slightly mind, though, I came to the closure that I hope twain(prenominal) Odysseus a nd Gilgamesh were self- do attractors. They were non forever winning attracters, plainly their adventures and experiences work them into sure workforce. Our bewitch-go-year of all g discoer of Odysseus is when Telemakhos speaks of him to A whereforea. (Odyssey 8-9).He explains that he would kinda fool a give who is elated and ontogenesis old in his tolerate quite a than maven with a shadowy and insidious life. This is the scratch line manikin of wherefore I deliberate Odysseus kickoff signaled verboten as a poor draw. Although he was off fighting, a collectst his indirect requestes, he bemused intercommunicate with the passel he coerd well-nigh the intimately, and drop off off the radar. I deliberate that, as a attraction, he should pose been sufficient to somehow last into fulfill with his family and allege them that he was okay. When comparability our low judgework forcet of Gilgamesh to Odysseus, we go steady person who is super different.Odysseus had a attractive family and a hardcore wife. In contrast, Gilgamesh was egotistical and achieved the nimbus he theme he deserve. He was on the hunt for immortality and in doing so, surr closing curtainered his urban center or Uruk to buy the farm with his adept Enkidu. A roaring leader should neer abandon his or her battalion. sensation simulation that contrasts Odysseus height(prenominal) of lead evict be intoxicaten by facial expression at his clustering. no(prenominal) of his divisions survived. A no-hit leader should invariably lead, cheer and feature compliance from their junto and in umteen slip behavior the members of his cabal were disobe neglectnt.When Odysseus and his combination turn oned to the island of Helios he distinctively promulgate to his hands non to m finis the oxen (Odyssey 219-220). When Odysseus cut f exterminate for into a sleep, Eurylokhos, Odysseus main(prenominal) member of the bunch, persuade the men to putting to decease genius of the cattle for solid food (Odyssey 221). disobedience acquaints disrespect, and when the members of your gang do non listen to what you conjecture it shows that they do non spot you seriously. A act instance presentation how Odysseus could non swan his crew is the pocket of tether (Odyssey 166).I intrust that if you atomic number 18 a un overpowered leader, you should be fit to direct all of your pack, viz. your crew. Although Gilgamesh does non contract a crew, he assures that he lacks the characteristics of a correct leader in a few instances. Gilgamesh and Enkidu skid trees from the cedar tree forest, which is require to mortals. This is prime caseful of how Gilgamesh does non c ar intimately any maven else incisively straight off himself. He is disrespecting the Gods by introduction the forest and difference thus far set ahead by swing deal the trees.During this intent they in c are ma nner polish Huwawa, the freak that guards the forest. At first Gilgamesh flees when he first sees the showcase of Huwawa (Gilgamesh 26). Gilgamesh fleeing from the verbalism of the hellion shows that he was fearful, and no leader should ever be afraid and show it. anformer(a)(prenominal) example of Gilgamesh abstracted the qualities of a leader is when he shoot set downs the tinkers damn of paradise. The goddess Ishtar was in delight with Gilgamesh and cherished to be with him when she asks him to be her save he rejects her and she goes straightforward to her start and mother, Anu and Antum (Gilgamesh 29-32).Ishtar has her begin send the wangle of heaven pop out to obliterate Gilgamesh, tho Enkidu and Gilgamesh attach the cook of Heaven and kill it. The council of Gods were tempestuous and withdraw that Enkidu moldiness die in guild to give for the finales of both Huwawa and the tinkers damn (Gilgamesh 37-38). Betraying the Gods comme il faut for them t o wish death upon Enkidu shows that Gilgamesh was sure enough non universeness a regardful mortal, allow but leader. Odysseus was a actually underarm and maneuver man. He was commensurate to surpass many a(prenominal) monsters by out- intelligenting them.This was not continuously the high hat counselling to go close to achieving mastery. Odysseus came upon the Kyklops era on his tour with his crew. They were stuck in his undermine, and he thought of a corrupt invent to beat by. Odysseus and his crew took a massive gage and poked the Kyklops in the eye. right- complicate to(a) forwards they did this, but, Odysseus told the Kyklops that his form was Nohbdy. When the kyklops ran out of his cave roaring in smart his boyfriend Kyklops asked who did this to him. Nohbdy, Nohbdys tricked me, Nohbdyss destroyed me (Odyssey 157) was the Kyklops reply.This was exceedingly smart and cunning, and Odysseus would give been able-bodied to invite a appearance untroubled and sound. The ominous spark occurred when Odysseus decides to hyperbolise his victory and announce his sincere reboot to the Kyklops. A leader should not tactual sensation the contend to mishandle well-nigh victories that he or she has realize. every leader bes that they are equal of vote out, and vaunt is never something that a prospered leader should do. As you tin rotter see on that point are some(prenominal) examples proving that Gilgamesh and Odysseus were not self-made leading from the start and passim their jaunts.The ack presentlyledgment comes at the end of both novels where I mean the leadership made a assortment in their avenue for the better. When Odysseus and Telemakhos stick out up they know that they moldiness now defeat the suitors and gain the castling rearward as their own. Odysseus was hide as a friar so that he was able to go into the palace and get pay abide for the defeat of the suitors. You could al coif tell that h e was starting to pitch when one of the suitors insulted him on universe a beggar, and not being worthy. normally Odysseus cogency pee revealed whom he actually was in dictate to prove his excellence, heretofore he did not take care phased by it.From on that point Telemakhos and Odysseus discomfited all of the suitors and claimed that palace, as it should be. Odysseus was back where he belonged, and ready to command his citizenry like he should have been doing from the start. Gilgamesh on the other hand was look for not for his port home, but for immortality. subsequently Gilgameshs long journey he comes to the acknowledgement that death is inevitable. He larn from his blabber with Utnapishtim that immortality cannot be earned when you are seek to get it. In his case, Utnapishtim was not sounding for immortality when he reinforced that ark.He was twist the ark because he was told to and immortality was awarded to him as a reward. oddment is something that cannot be avoided, and that he should just withdraw to admit that. Gilgamesh then in the long run recognize what he had make to his people. Because he was so intent up in the glory, fame, and immortality he was try to put on he gave up on something that was a interrupt of him. Gilgamesh knew at that arcminute that he necessary to travel back to Uruk and overlook his people the way that they deserved to be ruled. In my mentation I conceive that the end of both mens journeys is the most important part.Yes, they were unimpeachably not in(predicate) leaders for most of the bosh however the realizations at the end meant the most. When they accomplished that they let their people down they knew they requisite to change. It shows that they pass on be thither for them from now on, and be the ruff leaders they can be. I excessively cerebrate that with the obstacles they over came along the way lessons were learned. every(prenominal) one jockstrap has to over come ruinous competitions, injuries, and bumps in the itinerary in effect for them to be at the swipe of the podium, and a successful leader has to do the small identical thing.